* Add draft/outline of spreadsheets
* Finish reading from Excel
* Write to Excel + consistency edits
* Add pkgs for writing Excel files
* Release the 🐧s
* Reogranize to highlight tibble/data.frame diffs
* Write again
* Add spreadsheets reference + rename_with janitor
* Move janitor to TO DO in rectangular data
* Need to load tidyverse
* Show csv file
* Add TO DO note
* Use students instead of challenge file in this chp
* Quiet down some of the redundant messages
* Add bit on reading in multiple files
* Fix up students example
* Revert back to old dataset to match spreadsheets chapter
* Fix typos
* Use US spelling
* Comments from Hadley
* Incorporate Hadley's suggestions
Co-authored-by: Hadley Wickham <h.wickham@gmail.com>
In the section 3.6 on Geometrical objects, I momentarily understood that it was saying that one line is describing the entirety of the values in the data-set through the 4 value. This is unlikely, due to the context, but it happened to me before realizing that wasn't the case. This small change could avoid that misunderstanding.
add emphasis, to be consistent with treatment of *alpha* ? ...
row189 : "or to the shape aesthetic" --> "or to the *shape* aesthetic"
[sorry if I've forgotten how to use github]
First time reading this book - thank you!
The `,but` did not read well for me, as the statement
> [visualisations] don't scale particularly well because they require a human to interpret them
Does not seem to conflict with the statement
> Visualisations can surprise you
`and` appeared more appropriate as these appear to be two outcomes from visualizations; unless I am wrong about the intent of the sentence.
An alternative version, which I did not think was the intent, would read
> Visualisations can surprise you, but don't scale particularly well, because they require a human to interpret them.
Jakob Krigovsky
Hadley Wickham
Chris Saunders
GeroVanMi
ReeceGoding
Mine Cetinkaya-Rundel
gabrivera
Mark Beveridge
Eric Kitaif
Richard Knight