Update intro.Rmd (#961)
First time reading this book - thank you! The `,but` did not read well for me, as the statement > [visualisations] don't scale particularly well because they require a human to interpret them Does not seem to conflict with the statement > Visualisations can surprise you `and` appeared more appropriate as these appear to be two outcomes from visualizations; unless I am wrong about the intent of the sentence. An alternative version, which I did not think was the intent, would read > Visualisations can surprise you, but don't scale particularly well, because they require a human to interpret them.
This commit is contained in:
parent
bfaa80ba44
commit
b13b64896b
|
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ These have complementary strengths and weaknesses so any real analysis will iter
|
||||||
**Visualisation** is a fundamentally human activity.
|
**Visualisation** is a fundamentally human activity.
|
||||||
A good visualisation will show you things that you did not expect, or raise new questions about the data.
|
A good visualisation will show you things that you did not expect, or raise new questions about the data.
|
||||||
A good visualisation might also hint that you're asking the wrong question, or you need to collect different data.
|
A good visualisation might also hint that you're asking the wrong question, or you need to collect different data.
|
||||||
Visualisations can surprise you, but don't scale particularly well because they require a human to interpret them.
|
Visualisations can surprise you and don't scale particularly well because they require a human to interpret them.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Models** are complementary tools to visualisation.
|
**Models** are complementary tools to visualisation.
|
||||||
Once you have made your questions sufficiently precise, you can use a model to answer them.
|
Once you have made your questions sufficiently precise, you can use a model to answer them.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue